What's the Best Option for Hong Kong? 商品及服務稅的"利與弊"?
After a week's analysis, the writer finally come to his conclusion: Goods and services Tax is not the only possible solution,but the Best and fairest option for Hong Kong!
The best option , in the residents' view, of course is no need to pay any additional tax or even decrease the current tax rate. However, in the government's view or the view of the future community, it is not! To ensure her resident can continue to enjoy the social facilities, the social welfares, the cheap education and medical fee, the income of the government must be maintained or even increased. Broadening the tax base is a must.
In these few days, we can easily hear that a lot people come out and oppose the GST. Here, let the writer sum up some of their reasons:
a) It would bring a more difficult living to the low-income individual or family as they need to pay tax since then.
b) With GST, the cost of shopping would be higher, tourism would be badly affected. Tourist number would decrease, lots of shops would find difficulty in running their business.And thus HK economy would become poor.
c) It is costly to setup the system ( it is now estimated as 0.5 billion), as the efficiency of GST is still a question!
d) Investing environment may thus be affected; Hongkong may lose her position as the international financial centre.
Well, we cannot just look at the surface!
First, the writer think GST probably would not affect the current life of the low-income group including those under the protection of Comprehensive Social Security Assistance and those who are not. It is because the government would give them upfront,one-off supplement or allowance in order to compensate for GST's impact. You may argue that the proposed allowance announced now may not fully compensate for its impact. But do not forget, it's just the beginning of the consultation. In the writer's view, the government would finally give a greater allowance to this group if much of the people have this request and if the government really want to carry out this policy. So, people in the low-income group, don't worry!
Second, would GST really bring a decrease to the income from tourism? Frankly, the writer cannot confirm to say a "yes" or "no" because it depends. If the GST was set very high, Hong Kong's competitive and her tourism would of course be badly affected. But if the GST is relatively low and refund scheme for visitors is carried out together, even there is bad effect from GST, the effect would be small. Now, for Hong Kong's case, the GST is only set at 5% ( which is the same as that of Japan, Singapore, but lower than Australia and South Korea). Tourist who buys things over HKD$1500 in the same shop can get refund. Therefore, tourism in HK would not greatly affected. Moreover, as every one knows that the tourism is one of the main incomes of Hong Kong, would the government do such silly thing to attempt suicide? One can think about the answer.
What comes to our third, GST's ultimate use. We cannot deny that the initial cost for implementation of GST is quite expensive, but we should know that once GST is carried out, it will last for a long time. Its main ulimate use is not to increase its tax income but just to enhance and maintain the stable tax income for the government. As the againg problem could not be solved in the short future, number of labor force and salary tax income for the government would therefore decrease and become unstable. What make us concern most is that the government still need great financial support to settle the aging problem, even her salary tax income is decreasing .Since GST is independent of wage of the resident or the labor force, it would therefore give a good support for the government's expense on medicine and building elderly houses. With its long-run and important ultimate goal, the initial cost of GST is not worthless.
Fouth, investing environment will not be affected! Why? We can just look around the other financial centre in the world like US and Japan, their example in implementing GST tell us that GST is not that horrible. In addition, the Profits Tax, Property Tax will be cut if GST is carried out in Hong Kong.Some credit rating financial institutions also agree to carry out GST in HK because it brings the government a stable and healthy financial support.
GST is not the only option! If there is no GST, in order to maintain the government stable and healthy income, the government can greatly increase the salaries tax, or greatly decrease in the personal allowances. If so, as the consultation document said, nearly all the salary earners(even those who do not need to pay salary tax before) would be brought into the Salary Tax net. Moreover, this method cannot tackle the aging problem. When aging problem become more serious in the future, the labor force and salary tax will drop but the expense for aging problems (mainly the medical and living expense) will increase. The government would face a very difficult financial situation.
All in all, GST is not the only option for us, but after consideration of different levels and with different refund and allowance schemes, it would be the best option for HongKong and for our elderly life!
